컨트롤러 비교
Capture a quick audit for 컨트롤러 A and 컨트롤러 B, then compare polling rate, estimated latency, idle drift, trigger noise, and button coverage side by side.
Capture 컨트롤러s
READYA/B Metrics
| Metric | 컨트롤러 A | 컨트롤러 B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capture both controllers to build the comparison table. | |||
Winner Summary
저장d Session
How the comparison workflow works
The comparison audit is intentionally short. The first half of each capture samples the controller at rest to estimate drift and trigger noise, while the second half looks for button coverage and full stick travel. That produces a compact benchmark you can use before buying, selling, or repairing a controller.
Why this comparison matters
Short A/B checks are useful when you are trying to confirm whether a backup controller is still reliable, whether a repair helped, or whether a used controller is clearly worse than a known-good reference. 실행 중 both captures on the same system removes most of the environmental noise and makes the differences easier to trust.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need two controllers connected at the same time?
No. This tool is designed for sequential captures, so you can test 컨트롤러 A first and then swap to 컨트롤러 B.
What if both controllers tie?
That usually means they are very close in the sampled categories. If you need a clearer answer, run the more detailed specialist tests for drift, latency, or polling rate.
Can I compare wired versus Bluetooth on the same controller?
Yes. Label one capture as wired and the other as Bluetooth, then compare the connection and latency-related metrics side by side.
Is this good enough for resale listings or repair notes?
Yes. The table gives you a quick browser-based snapshot that is useful for documenting condition before selling, buying, or troubleshooting.